
Waitlist open
AI engineering moved to the systems around the model. Same model for everyone. A real environment. A hidden eval. Leave your email. We will send a seat when the playground is up.
One email. We write when problem 01 opens. Nothing else.
How it works
Three visible tasks. A naive ReAct loop. You will fail some of them on purpose.
System prompt, every tool call, every result, the grader verdict. This is how you debug a harness.
Thirty hidden tasks. Same model. Pass is 85 percent. A careful loop lands higher, with tokens still in budget.
No account yet. One email. The playground comes after the host is up.
FAQ
The software around the model: the loop, the tools, the context, retries, when to stop. Not the model. That file is what you write here.
If everyone picks a different model, you cannot tell who built the better loop. Same model, same environment, same hidden eval. The only variable is the harness.
The full transcript of one task: system prompt, every message, every tool call and result, the final answer, the grader verdict. You debug from this, not from the score.
When the eval environment is hosted. We will email you a seat. No drip sequence. No newsletter.
One Python file. from harness import llm, tools, Task. The starter is a naive ReAct loop. Run three visible tasks. Submit thirty hidden. Pass is 85 percent.
Yes for the waitlist and the first problems. A cheap pinned model. Run is three tasks. Submit is capped so nobody burns the bill.